In ? w??l? ??t?n ?ill?? wit? ??stl? ?n? ??stl?, t???? is s?m?t?in? ??????n?l? s??t?in? ????t t?? ???s?nc? ?? c?t? in??nts. T??i? c?????ic ??c?s ?n? inn?c?nt ???s ??v? ?n ?lm?st m??ic?l ???lit?, c????l? ?? m?ltin? ?w?? st??ss ?n? c?nicism. In t?is ??ticl?, w? ??lv? int? t?? ?nc??ntin? ???lm ?? c?t? in??nts ?n? ??w t??i? tin? ???s?nc? ??s t?? ??w?? t? t??c? ?n? w??m ?v??? ????t t??? ?nc??nt??.
On? ?? t?? m?st c??tiv?tin? ?s??cts ?? in??nts is t??i? inn?c?nc?. T??? ??? ????, ?ns??il?? ?? t?? c?m?l?xiti?s ?? t?? w??l?, ?n? t??i? ??t??nticit? is ? ????t? ?? ???s? ?i?. T?is inn?c?nc? ???ws ????l? in, ??min?in? ?s ?? t?? ???it? t??t ?xists wit?in ???s?lv?s ?n? t?? ????t? ?? sim?licit?.
An in??nt’s smil? is ? t???s??? ????n? m??s???. It ??s t?? ?xt?????in??? ??ilit? t? ??in? j?? t? ?v?n t?? m?st s?m??? ?? s??ls. W??n ?n in??nt smil?s, it’s ?s t????? t??? ??? s???in? ? ?i?c? ?? t??i? ???n?l?ss ????in?ss wit? ???, ?n? it’s n???l? im??ssi?l? n?t t? ?? t??c??? ?? t??i? ???i?nt ??ins.