Former Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. shredded Vice President Kamala Harris and the ABC moderators, David Muir and Linsey Davis, following her debate against former President Donald Trump.
In an appearance on Newsmax TV, RFK Jr. noted that one of the main electoral issues this cycle is inflation and the economy, issues that Harris never addressed.
“We have a first-generation of American kids who can’t get into homes. We have the unaffordability at the gas station, at the grocery store. People who are downgrading ingredients to make it through the checkout counter, elderly people who are cutting up their prescriptions to pay for food or fuel,” the former Democrat said.
“This is happening all over our country. It’s the first time in American history you have a generation of kids who’s going to be worse off than their parents. And Vice President Harris has had four years to deal with these issues, and they’ve just gotten worse,” he continued. “And unfortunately, we had moderators who were clearly biased, who were constantly fact-checking Donald Trump. But none of these kinds of whoppers that the vice president was saying, and none of her failure to really explain that answer, that first question, that very, very critical first question. They simply sat there on the sidelines and allowed that to pass.”
WATCH:
Fox News host Greg Gutfeld referred to the presidential debate between Trump and Harris as a “DEI debate” after the blatant prejudice demonstrated by moderators Muir and Davis, along with their one-sided “fact-checking.”
“Well, I don’t know who won, but I know who lost it was the American people. You know, you could say if you complain about the refs, you’re losing. Well, if the refs are corrupt, you’ve got a complaint because everybody lost,” Gutfeld said during a segment of “The Five” on Wednesday. “I felt like my brain was being waterboarded by the sheer nonsense of these idiot moderators.”
“I honestly don’t know how anyone can decide who won the debate. That’s like trying to guess the price of a painting that you suspect is a forgery. You can’t objectively decide a winner in a sham competition. This is truly the first DEI debate where one candidate was subjected to a high standard and the other was held to no standards at all,” he continued.
“They removed the essence of fairness to achieve an outcome that could not be scored. You cannot score that. That is why you can’t say who won or who lost. A liberal should be ashamed that your candidate needed the odds to be stocked so heavily in their favor.”
While most of the corporate legacy media praised Harris and declared her the winner, many viewers of the debate told Reuters that they were still not convinced that she is the better candidate.
The outlet invited ten respondents who claimed they were still unsure about the November 5th election to watch the ninety-minute debate and then provide their feedback. Six of them declared they would definitely or most likely vote for Trump, compared to three who supported Harris and one who was unsure.
Several said that before they would contemplate voting for Harris, she must get significantly more serious about covering the costs of her expensive priorities.
With regard to addressing the exorbitant costs of housing and household goods, five respondents characterized the veep as “vague.”
“I still don’t know what she is for,” said Mark Kadish, 61, an entrepreneur in Florida. “There was no real meat and bones for her plans.” Robert Wheeler, 48, a security firm executive in Nevada who was previously leaning toward Harris, said her posturing and platitudes left him feeling more committed to voting for Trump who he said has actually proposed tangible policies to back up his promises.
“I felt like the whole debate was Kamala Harris telling me why not to vote for Donald Trump instead of why she’s the right candidate,” Wheeler added.
